Wednesday, May 29, 2019

Homosexuality and Misogyny in Frankenstein Essay -- Frankenstein essay

Homo cozyity and Misogyny in Frankenstein In Mary Shelleys novel, Victor Frankenstein suffers an extreme psychological crisis adjacent his violation of what is considered a fundamental biological principle. His creation of life undermines the role of women in his life and the role of sexuality, and allows existing misogynist and homosexual tendencies to surface. Victor represses what he has uncovered about himself, and it merges into a cohesive whole in his psyche that becomes projected on the instrument of revelation, the monster. Victors creation allows him to split his sexuality into independent components. on that point are three fundamental purposes to sexuality presented in Mary Shelleys narrative the psychological benefits of companionship, the unique physical pleasures of sexuality, and the desire to pass on ones genes and behaviors through procreation. In social animals, the process of choosing partners for sexual intercourse and companionship is founded on reproductiv e goals. Victors ability to create life independently eliminates the importance of reproduction in choosing companions and sexual partners. Each of the three elements of Victors sexuality become separated, and then associated with his principal contemporaries, the people closest to him Henry Clerval as companionship, Elizabeth Lavenza as reproduction, and the monster as sexual pleasure. Elizabeth at one time or another represents all female roles to Victor. In turn, she is Victors cousin, sister, mother, and wife. These are not figurative relationships, implied by the text they are actual labels utilize to Elizabeth, by Victors parents while he is still a child. When she joins the family, she is his cousin, a... ... kill his brother, and to be rid of Elizabeth and also of the conflict that his relationship with Clerval brings. The implication is that anyone who follows the split to its logical demonstration will find themselves in crisis, when they inevitably upset their mental balance, as Frankenstein did in rejecting women. Works Cited Lowe-Evans, Mary. Frankenstein Mary Shellys Wedding Guest. New York Twayne Publishers, 1993. Maslow. A.H A theory of human motivation (Psycol. Rev, 50, 370-396, 1943) Oates, Joyce Carol. Frankenstein foundation as Catastrophe. Mary Shellys Frankenstein. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York Chelsea House Publishers, 1987. Shelly, Mary. Frankenstein Or the Modern Prometheus. New York Penguin Books, 1978. Tropp, Martin. Mary Shellys Monster. Boston Houghton Mifflin, 1976.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.